![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Name: Eric Location: Santa-Clara, CA Motorcycle: K2 Chtrom, 07 99ty A Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 852
|
Tubes or tubeless?
First, thank you Pashnit for this new Adv section. I am not quite ready to go down to Panama, but I am thinking about it. Let us get that new section to use.
The new bike I bought is shod with Continental TKC80, but the front is tubeless and the rear has a tube. My goal with this bike is to be able to repair a flat if I get a flat in Lala Land, and I wonder what is best. Like every kid, I repaired tires on my bicycles and I feel I could do that on a motorcycle, but that means carrying irons all the time. Tubeless repair kits seem a little better and lighter as far as packing goes. Carrying both is even worse since the 990 has NO storage room, not even under the seat. I think I will go for tubes since I also would like to be able to replace the tires on my own. Even if the local Sunnyvale shop does not charge much, knobbies tend to melt very quickly with my weight (on the throttle). Is there a tubed road or half-and-half tire that does not require a press to break the bead, by the way? Hoping some of these questions make sense, where does everybody stands? And, does that really matter if I do not balance a tubed knobby tire? Thank you, =oSò Eric |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Yes, I'm the guy
Name: Tim Location: NorCal Motorcycle: Hayabusa Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,609
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
Your welcome.
![]() Eric, this is mildly related, but I've always changed my own tires (for the most part) and will sheepishly admit I use the hillbilly method of a c-clamp and elbow grease to break the bead. I just got this: http://www.bestrestproducts.com/cele...s/beadbreaker/ and changed my front the other day with the 'BeadBrakr' (same guys that make the Cycle Pump). It's designed for riders to carry while traveling really- likely the intended buyer is a dual sport type. It did work, although I had to remove both rotors to position it properly. As soon as I can find time to build the webpage, will add this to the Pashnit Moto Store, sells for $150. Now that I've used one of these devices (this is not the only one on the market), I'm wondering what I was thinking for the last 15 years breaking the bead by hand. On another mildly related note- I bought a balancer ($100) from the No-Mar guys a year or so ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Name: Eric Location: Santa-Clara, CA Motorcycle: K2 Chtrom, 07 99ty A Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 852
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
Yes, I read this before with interest and it has its place in this section. However, if I was going for elsewhere, I would prefer a few pieces of milk bottles, some soap and a heavy set of tire irons. The last thing you want when you are in trouble is your backup letting you down. A heavy piece of metal can help in many ways, from pitching a tent to venting a pitch.
-- Eric |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Go'n some place new......
Name: Jim Location: Reedley, California Motorcycle: KTM 500EXC, Goldwing Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,775
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
Quote:
Your KTM, on the other had, has spoke wheels designed for tires with tubes, as far as I know. I don't believe your wheels are set up for tubless tires so I'm very concerned that you do not have a tube on your front tire. I can't call the KTM dealership to confirm this because it is Monday and they are closed. I have TKC80's on my Honda XR650L that are designed for tubes and that is how they are set up. I have the TKC's balanced when they are installed and the installer said the side wall was soft indicating you do not need a bead breaker to get this tire off the rim. The Dunlop 606's I have used have much stiffer side walls than the TKC80's on my XR650L and the 606's didn't need a bead breaker to get them off the rim. The 606's give better traction off road but are noisier on road and wear out quicker than the TKC's. I have been very happy with my TKC80's on both the XR650L and my GSA. I would highly recommend those tires for almost any trip. They work well everywhere. They just don't last as long as Tourance Tires but I don't know if they make that tire for a bike designed to use tubes and my guess is that you would need a bead breaker for that tire.
__________________
I came to ride and ride and ride and ride............ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Name: Eric Location: Santa-Clara, CA Motorcycle: K2 Chtrom, 07 99ty A Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 852
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
Quote:
-- Eric |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
motosaurus
Name: Ed Location: Long Beach, CA Motorcycle: at least a couple Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 609
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
I don't know if it would work very well in an offroad application, but there is a process that can seal spoked/tubed rims and allow you to run them tubeless. Not every rim can be sealed, but Buchanan's in L.A. along with WheelWorks in Garden Grove can do this.
I had a Triumph Bonneville with a sealed rear rim and went about 18k miles with no problems at all. Whether or not the rim is suitable depends on the amount of "drop" in the rim, not enough drop means not enough room for the sealant. Just thought I'd mention it... Ed |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Diggin'dirt
Name: Tom Location: Carmel Valley Motorcycle: WR250R Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,744
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
Quote:
Now on your question if tubed or tubeless is better. Almost all dirt bikes have spoked wheels and thus tubed. Probably for a reason, given tougher riding terrain. Tubeless tire are easier to plug, especially a rear. Removing the wheel, breaking the bead to fix a tubed tire takes irons, strength, and a practiced skill. Although if a tubeless tire cuts a sidewall, or breaks the bead and flats, can be a bigger pain. Can be an endless debate if one is better than the other. Only advice is to know what you're running with, have proper repair items with you when riding, and practice the repair procedures on an old tire/wheel.
__________________
You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you get what you need - The Rolling Stones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Adventurer
Name: Joe Location: San Francisco Motorcycle: '04 DL650 (VStrom) Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 178
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Diggin'dirt
Name: Tom Location: Carmel Valley Motorcycle: WR250R Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,744
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
Quote:
About 4 years ago I picked up a nail in a Monterey parking lot during my work lunch break and flatted the rear. I remember being kind of excited, as I actually had my tire plug kit with me in tail bag. I had bought it because the Metzler Tourance tires that came with my bike had "tubeless" written on the side wall. So I pull out the nail, ream the hole with provided pick to round it out, use the gizmo to insert a plug, and snip off the plug end. Perfect, so used the CO2 cartridges to inflate, and nothing. Use them all, and still have a flat. I'm checking the plug and it looks perfect. So I call BMW Santa Cruz County on my cell and talk with service and they immediately point out my F650GS has spoked wheels, and therefore requires a tube. So the nail must have punctured the tube as well as tire. Dooah. I was in a time pinch to get back to work, so used a can of fix a flat gooo. It worked, was able to ride the bike and I was sure to warn the shop about the gooo next day when I took it in to replace the tire and tube.
__________________
You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you get what you need - The Rolling Stones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Super Member
Name: Mark Location: Bakersfield, Ca Motorcycle: F800GS & DR 650 Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,650
|
Re: Tubes or tubeless?
One BIG reason to stay with tubes is the ability to radically drop your tire pressure for soft dirt and not have to worry about breaking the bead. I'd say that if the rim is not designed (like the big GS rims are) for tubeless, don't change it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|